Messages

Hi all, I just wanted to point out, that nobody is posting decklists at

https://mtgdecks.net/Highlander or https://www.cardmarket.com/de/Magic/Decks/Events/Format/Highlander

I would like to see that changed, because its like the tournamens never took place - at least for me.

Please let me know if somebody plans to take care of it.

I'd be glad to help in any way possible.

Cheers

IZZET by firestarter: https://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/30-01-18-izzet-control/
Scapeshift by Payron: https://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/4c-wo-w-scapeshift/
SULTAI by K0d013e4st:  https://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/27-01-18-sultai-midrange/
AZORIUS w/ black by dsck: https://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/uwb-special-edition/
DIMIR Necro by Vazdru: https://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/ub-necro/
Academy by Silberhase: https://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/22-01-18-academy
IZZET by r4nd0m: https://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/22-01-18-vMx-izzet/
Scapeshift by TaZi: https://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/25-01-18-scapeshift/

http://www.filedropper.com/180121replayladderr1vssilberhase

3:1 vs Silberhase
If decklists will be published after round 1, I will upload the replay, if that is okay.

assn74b1

Id like to do something like this for Highlander: https://vintagesuperleague.com/

Please keep my PP until fürther notice, thank you.

Grats to TaZi and K0d0!!! Also, thanks for the vids (sofar) : )

[OFFTOPIC]

OFFTOPIC

I dont want to hijack that thread with my nonsense more than necessary but I was kind of referring to OPs weird hate for facebook (where we have a lot of discussions nowadays because it is easy to reach and convinient for a lot of people) I do understand when people have reservations in regards to facebook in general but I think the HL groups there helped us way more in terms of visibility than the forum ever did. We have vivid discussions and people do come in contact with most of the council members which, I find is an important step to make the whole ban/unban/development of the format/ more transparent and comprehensible.

@Tabris, I wasnt aware of the context, but in regards to FB, you said its easier to reach than this forum, and I dont understand.
If somebody cant reach this forum easily, he or she has no business playing the format competitively, imho.

Also, if FB is more convenient, can we start making our own software more convenient?

Lastly, id like to see more players or even Council members playing matches or hosting tournaments on Cockatrice and discuss with everybody here in the forum. That would increase visibility.

Im not against a FB group, but as far as I can tell online, it doesnt lead to new players at all. And its been like that for a long time.

Thanks for your response and have a great holiday!

aye

https://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/12-12-17-oGE-jund/

thank you tonytahiti,  massively appreciated! : )

Luca 12 Jund

Hi!

Im very interested in this decklist and would really appreciate it, if someone could post it or make a picture or screenshot.

Thanks in advance : )

It looks like the forum participation isnt what you hoped for.

Never lucky.

I dont see how this is anything but a savage trolling. I love you Tabris, but are you out of your mind?

• It needs more time to evaluate all votes for the council (of course depends on how many people would participate)
• What happens with wrong votes (spent too many points or other mistakes)

Thanks for your reply DarkLight : )
I dont think it would be difficult at all to register a thousand players and let them vote once per year.
In fact, I can easily imagine a mailing list with automated evaluation of the returns.

Im sure similar ideas have been suggested a million times in the past. Isnt that the logical thing to do?

 

[neverending]

Hi all!

First off, let me just briefly say thank you to the Council and all the good people who made the format what it is today.

I do not post very often, but Im an avid player.

I would like to repond to the neverending bannedlist discussion.
Really, its only some half-baked thoughts, but I would like to see everybody think about a new system, and maybe build on these suggestions.

Lets...

• start with the current bannedlist.
• periodically have players vote for how much cards should be taxed with, pointwise (simple mailing list).
• also vote for a threshhold of points for each card to be legal.
• very gradually adjust for any discrepancies between the current bannedlist and voting results.

Personally, my main fun police is the relative high frequency of changes to the bannedlist, and in all honesty, althought I think the Council's statements with every un/ban are obviously a good thing,...
... I would very much like to see more tournament- and playtestdata to back it up. Otherwise it just feels like it could have been argued either way and its tough to comprehend.

That being said, thanks again for everybodys efforts and Ill talk to you later! : )

Thank you, that is great! : )