Really hard to decide, I vote for
A)
although I could accept B) as an alternative
A)
although I could accept B) as an alternative
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Sebastian on 04-02-2013, 11:47:43 AM
it seems that the meta turned since january
Quote from: W0lf on 07-01-2013, 10:05:30 PM
TPS won the last GP, RDW before that and you still complain about Natural Order and Stoneforge, sad noobs.....
Quote from: ChristophO on 06-01-2013, 09:53:28 PMthats not my name :p
@Musdam
Quote from: LasH on 06-01-2013, 09:22:30 PM
Hard counter:
Oath, tabernacle, black vise, b2b, blood moon, pop.
They strongly punish different archetypes. These cards are essential to keep the balance. All of these cards have hard disadvantages (because you need to build around them).
Quote from: LasH on 06-01-2013, 09:22:30 PMQuote from: Madsam on 06-01-2013, 09:04:10 PM
ChristophO
Aggro decks don't need spoiler mulligan, because they are consistent. Midrange, Combo and Control Decks need the spoiler mulligan because they are less consistent/inconsisten (Depending on the deck itself). If the spoiler mulligan is removed, only aggro improves, so ask yourself: Does aggro really need improvement? The whole metagame is flooded with it aggrodecks or very agressive midrange decks like Naya, I really don't want to see a meta in which aggro is even more favored than now.
I think the spoiler mulligan enables a more diverse meta, because the consitency of many decks is increased, which would otherwise less or not be viable in this format.
I loled. I started the whole discussion about the mulligan because the aggro decks abuse it at most. Able to run 25-30 lands in 3-4c, something a control deck cannot.
Page created in 0.012 seconds with 17 queries.